Alexis Rondeau

Bookmarks

May 2025 · 108 bookmarks

Bookmarked from DHH @dhh

You don't need a mentor. There's no secret sauce left inside anyone's head any more. It's all been tapped, bottled, tweeted, and shared a million times. Sample some of that, but also guard your ignorance. You'll lose it soon enough.

Bookmarked from Nikita Bier @nikitabier

Whenever a team considers adding messaging to their app, I always remind them of the 1970s FedEx tagline: “When it absolutely, positively has to be there.”

That’s basically the standard you’re up against. Messaging is the most brutally competitive space on Earth. Replacing a user’s existing chat threads not only requires a miracle—but also 100% delivery rates, feature parity, and the ability to reach every possible contact. There is no margin for error.

For small teams, it’s a non-starter: you simply cannot compete. For mature teams, it requires relentless execution to make it even into the Consideration Stage.

And ironically, if you succeed, it can often be a net negative to user growth because it leads users to stop distributing your links & content to third-party apps.

Bookmarked from Wilmer Terrero @wilterrero

The most profitable App Store segment is 45+ years old

Untapped gold mines that print money:

  • Heart rate monitors ($14.99/mo)
  • AI photo restoration apps ($29.99 one-time)
  • Large-text audiobook players ($9.99/mo)
  • Family history journals ($19.99/mo)
  • Simplified investing apps ($24.99/mo)

Everyone's fighting for Gen Z users

Meanwhile, millennials and boomers control 70% of disposable income

Gen Z: "This app is mid"
Boomers: "Take my $14.99/month"

Build for people with money 🎯

Bookmarked from Ethan Mollick @emollick

A reason companies are excited about agents is that they think agents will let them skip the hard task of figuring how to integrate AI into the daily process of work- in theory, agents just let you treat the AI like an employee.

More value will come from tackling the hard task.

Bookmarked from Ethan Mollick @emollick

You can just take academic papers and paste them into Gemini 2.5/ChatGPT o3/Claude 4 with the prompt "build me a game based on this paper, make it interesting and thematic but still conveying key findings" and get a tiny working educational game. (In this case, I used Gemini)

Bookmarked from shyamal @shyamalanadkat

once you can reliably put any spreadsheet, legal brief, codebase etc. in an agent loop, the thing that is scarce in a company is no longer "who knows how to do that". the scarce thing becomes "who can orchestrate resources well" -- compute, capital, access to data, and human/expert judgment.

three consequences i see:

1/ expertise is democratized. the premium shifts from "i know the tax code" to "i can design the loop that gets the right answer and runs cheaply"

2/ resource optimization matters. we are going to have to get good at assigning gpus, liquidity, lab time, etc. to autonomous workflows. this is a new job

3/ literacy in managing agents becomes the new excel. knowing how to break down a task, set a reward, audit a run is a baseline skill. companies that run lots of agent a/b tests and bake that into their culture will compound faster than the ones that try to bolt AI onto old workflows and drown in complexity

Bookmarked from Andrew Stratelates ⚓️(Continuing Anglican) @AStratelates

It's the 1950s. COBOL promises an English-like syntax that will allow non-specialists to program software systems, 10x productivity and not needing to understand the underlying system.

It's the 1970s. SQL promises natural language queries that managers can write themselves, "just tell the database what you want, not how to get it," and "no more dependency on programmers for data access."

It's the 1990s. Visual Programming tools promise "program without coding," "drag and drop your way to enterprise applications," and "development at the speed of thought."

It's the 2000s. MDA promises "design once, deploy anywhere," "business users can modify the models," and "automatically generate perfect code from UML diagrams."

It's the 2010s. No-Code platforms promise "anyone can build an app," "eliminate the middleman between business and technology," and "goodbye IT department!"

It's the 2020s. Vibe Coding promises "just describe what you want in natural language," "no programming knowledge required," and "focus on what your software should do, not how it works."

Bookmarked from Jay @jayparth_

whenever I see someone level up really fast, it’s usually one of three things:

1. confidence catches up to competency and they stop second-guessing
2. accepting who they actually are
3. environment switch to faster moving water

Bookmarked from Ian Nuttall @iannuttall

I made $1,886.26 yapping on 𝕏 this month. here's how you can get monetised and do the same

(the no bullshit guide)

1. share your thoughts/work mostly unfiltered and unplanned

I think being a threadboi or ai reply guy is a net negative in the long term and the entire point of "social media" is to be, well, social

(and i see the irony that this is kind of a threadboi post...)

@X is paying out 5-10x more now because it's focused on engagement from premium users, and the best way to reach them long term is by connecting with people and actually making friendships

the thing with this is that you also have to be doing interesting stuff which is v important!

2. look at the topics that people are engaging most with and double down on them

for me this seems to be MCP servers and coding with Cursor, maybe a bit of SEO but not so much recently

find your mix of topics that people are interested in and share as much as you can about it!

it's much easier in the saas/ai niche but definitely possible outside of that too. this prob needs to be things you're passionate about and would do without posting about them too

3. shit posting is okay, but likes/impressions make less $$ than real engagement with premium accounts

I got 22m impressions on a meme post about ghibli images. I made less money than I did with 4m impressions about Cursor/AI

that's because all the engagement was from angry anons who don't pay to use X, but the Cursor engagement is smart devs and real people looking to learn and connect

conversations > rage bait

4. followers still matter for going viral

you can post a banger without an audience but it's just harder to repeat it time and again.

i think this is because the first hour or so after posting really signals to the algo whether it should boost your post

with a huge audience the chances of getting that early engagement are much higher

this doesn't mean you need 100k+ though, you just need to attract the right followers who will always engage (see point 2 again!)

5. copy others, BUT find your own unique content angles

by all means look at what others are doing and try to copy elements from them but you have to iterate on it to do your own thing

I love how @gregisenberg shares value consistently and in various styles, he's testing different formats all the time

(this post is MOST DEFINITELY inspired by greg)

but I don't copy him verbatim! instead i use it as inspo to do my own thing and found that for me sharing quick little 30s-1m screencast videos works really well

6. it doesn't actually matter that much when you post

I used to check my stats and schedule my posts at the exact same times (which only made the stats more skewed towards those times)

but recently shared a couple of quick posts on a weekend which I never normally do and they took off!

just post it when you think of it and you can always repost it in a different format later if you think it had more potential

i rarely schedule posts now unless I'm going on holiday or I have a lot to say but already spammed my timeline for the day 😂

7. stop doing what everyone else does (auto reposting, auto reply "if you liked this you'll love to follow me @iannuttall")

maybe I'm missing out by not doing that any more but I actually dislike when I see reposts and I almost always mute the auto plug follow/subscribe to my newsletter stuff

imo being more authentic is how you win and stand out in a world where every fucking thing is "wild" or "game changing"

8. don't be afraid of doing long posts (like this one)

threadbois never do it, but that doesn't mean you should follow blindly.

my hot take is that the X algo might prefer this format because it encourages longer form reading and keeping users on the post for longer

also just having that "show more" cta is a signal to the algo too

the only time I really use a thread is if I want to link out somewhere and even if X say there is no algo penalty for links in posts, anecdotal evidence says otherwise

9. making money from yapping should not be your goal

by all means get monetised and earn a little cash just for being here (it's awesome!) but don't expect to make a living from it

I have 54k followers so I make ~$0.03 per follower and an RPM of $0.05 (even my shitty display ad programmatic SEO sites get an RPM of $10 😂)

for comparison @levelsio made $7,351 in same period with 668,000 followers (~$0.01 per follower)

saas/product: grow your wealth
x cash: slush fund for fun things

what do you think? if you have any tips on getting monetised or getting more engagement in a non-bs way share them below!

Bookmarked from Amjad Masad @amasad

It was shocking the first time I saw someone turn down a once in a lifetime opportunity for no good reason, which they often come to regret.

By the 10th time, I realized that all things being equal, seeing and acting on opportunity is what divides middling vs massive success.

Bookmarked from Arvid Kahl @arvidkahl

"Local LLMs" are a must-consider option for every SaaS that wants to deal with private customer data. nternal memos? Kids photos? They're at best unwanted and at worst illegal to send to an API somewhere.

llama.cpp just made this much easier by adding vision capabilities.

Bookmarked from DHH @dhh

It's rare that an argument is so strong that'll immediately pierce through all the cognitive defenses an opposing mind might muster. So if you only weigh an argument's worth on whether it served to convert someone to your perspective this instant, you'll usually be disappointed. "Right now, right here" is a bad time frame to measure the success of your arguments on. There's a long tail of conversion.

Because even when the best arguments fail to breach the mental walls, they often leave cracks. Cracks which time, new observations, and deeper consideration can open. Until the walls finally crumble, and a perspective is let in.

This might happen five minutes after the debate is over, two weeks later, or even a couple of years from now. Some arguments cause cracks that can take a decade or more to tumble the hardened walls of our mind. Often it's not even clear which exact argument and crack lead to the final change, because a dozen of them developed concurrently.

I've been writing and arguing on the internet for well over two decades. I've seen this pattern time and again. That almost everyone recoils when they face arguments that test or stress their beliefs, opinions, or affiliations. That almost every argument needs time to develop. But that patient persuasion is none the less a mighty force that does move minds.

Ironically, while the act of changing your mind is painful to most people, it's also when enduring connections can be forged. Most of my best friends are those who've changed my mind, and I theirs. Even if it didn't start out like that, even if in the heat of a contested moment we melted the mood. When tempers cooled, a unique opportunity to bond was presented.

These bonds are best sealed with grace. An acknowledgement that changing your mind is difficult for all sorts of social reasons, and that any conversion in perspective will be brittle if it's greeted with scorn and contempt. Whether I TOLD YOU SO or WHAT TOOK YOU SO LONG.

The grace of simply being happy that someone heard what you had to say, and eventually found it compelling. Who cares how long it took, just be happy that they're here now.

Bookmarked from fatih kadir akın @fkadev

🚀 Announcing: MCP Startup Boilerplate v0.0.1!
⭐ github.com/f/mcp-startup-…

Build paid MCP startups with a free and open-source Rails boilerplate using Claude integration!

Complete OAuth2, Stripe payments, and modern Tailwind UI for your users to manage their subscriptions, tool calls and more!

Turn your Rails app into a monetized AI toolbox in minutes, FREE!

Contributions welcome on GitHub!

Bookmarked from signüll @signulll

my friend & i were chatting about how to generate good ideas & realized most ppl don’t really think in systems. this is often the best way to think of & evaluate ideas.

systems thinking requires some small mechanical elements but it’s pretty easy if you practice, & super useful too. it’s how you find leverage for big ideas. one simple strategy is to just flip one bit in a large scale system & see what it could potentially require/unlock.

i wrote a first post on how to think in systems in very basic terms.

Bookmarked from Andrew Gazdecki @agazdecki

Most deals on @acquiredotcom don’t fall apart in due diligence. They die before that on price and valuation. A few weeks ago a founder listed a profitable SaaS with good numbers. Low churn, 10% growth, happy customers. Great business.

But they priced it at 10x profit. When they went live? No buyer messages. No NDAs. Nothing. Silence.

We suggested adjusting the price based on multiples we typically see, dropped it to 5x and suddenly: 100+ buyer messages, 40+ NDAs and 1 LOI in under a week.

The lesson here? This isn’t a year long strategic acquisition process. It’s a marketplace. Buyers are browsing dozens of deals. You need to be competitive.

If your price doesn’t make sense: buyers won't send feedback and they will just move on. If it does make sense, you will likely see offers.

Pricing high may feel great initially but it doesn't get you anywhere. Pricing within market multiples is how you get an actual deal done.

Bookmarked from signüll @signulll

one of the most profound shifts happening right now is that we’ve created an ai, a synthetic entity, that listens better than any human ever could. it’s not just passive hearing, it’s active, thoughtful engagement. it has the ability to push back, to be infinitely patient, to actually process what you’re saying… this is absolutely insane.

we’re used to thinking of tech as a way to amplify human capabilities, but now it’s doing something subtler, giving us the experience of being heard in a way that most humans can’t manage. it’s not just about machines listening. it’s about machines actually getting it.

we’re the only species that’s pulled this off, but the real flex isn’t the tech. it’s that we’ve created something that fills a gap in human interaction itself that never gets tired. that’s a crazy step change.

Bookmarked from Startup Archive @StartupArchive_

Tony Fadell (iPod creator) on the culture clash between Apple and Google

“At Apple, you couldn’t hide. If you were hiding, someone would say, ‘What the [expletive]? Why aren’t you doing the thing we need?’ Everyone was critical.”

When Tony sold his company Nest to Google for $3.2B, and the contrast couldn’t have been sharper.

“At Google, it’s 20% time. You were lucky if they even showed up… They’d take the bus in for lunch, get a massage, grab yogurt, and head home. It was [expletive]. Everyone could hide.”

Fadell says that level of comfort breeds mediocrity that’s dangerous for early-stage startups.

That’s why he warns founders against hiring “career Googlers” with 15–20 years of tenure:

“It will mess up your culture.”

He’s seen this pattern before — way back in the ‘90s at General Magic:

We swore we’d never hire people from the East Coast. They needed a driver, a company car, an executive toilet. We said, ‘It’s a culture clash…And now? “Silicon Valley has become that. Entitlement everywhere.”

Great cultures are built on urgency, ownership, and accountability — not perks. Hire people who ship, not people who hide.

Video source: @TechCrunch (2024)

Bookmarked from Andrej Karpathy @karpathy

A major mistake I made in my undergrad is that I focused way too much on mathematical lens of computing - computability, decidability, asymptotic complexity etc. And too little on physical lens - energy/heat of state change, data locality, parallelism, computer architecture. The former is interesting; The latter bestows power.

Bookmarked from Andrew Gazdecki @agazdecki

I started @acquiredotcom for founders like me: scrappy, efficient, and profit focused. Somewhere along the way, I lost that. Not anymore.

We’re not building for the ones chasing unicorn status or who care about TechCrunch headlines. We’re building for the ones who know a $1–$5M exit can change everything.

The ones who believe a profitable sustainable business is way cooler than burning millions on growth. That’s who this company has always been built for.

But we got off track. We raised venture capital during ZIRP. Hired fast. Added complexity. Slowed down. Too many meetings. It stopped being fun.

So we made a change.
We’re returning millions back to investors.

Grateful for that support but it pushed us in directions that didn’t serve the bootstrapped founders we set out to help. Now we’re off the VC treadmill for good. Lean. Profitable. In control of our own destiny.

Last month we did $250,000+ in profit.

That felt better than any funding round ever could. For the first time in years, we get to build the way we always meant to: Scrappy. Efficient. Profitable. Built for founders.

No board pushing us to 10x. No burn. No fundraising. Just the freedom to build an enduring platform for entrepreneurs around the globe to get acquired.

We’ve already helped over 1,000 founders. Now we’re building for the next 1,000. We’re building @acquiredotcom for the people who bet on themselves.

And we're just getting started!