Alexis Rondeau

Bookmarks

5632 bookmarks · page 18 of 226

Bookmarked from César Álvarez @cesaralvarezll

This is how a Bible chat app making almost $1M/month is doing its onboarding:

Onboarding

  • Clean design + smooth animations
  • Shows social proof (reviews)
  • Collects key user data
  • Gets users to interact and commit early

Paywall

  • Eye catching animation
  • Soft paywall
  • Only offers a weekly plan
  • 7 day free trial

Your onboarding is your first impression, make it count.

Start building yours with Anything

Bookmarked from Maziyar PANAHI @MaziyarPanahi

🚨 Over 1 billion rows of psychiatric genetics data. Now on Hugging Face.

ADHD. Depression. Schizophrenia. Bipolar. PTSD. OCD. Autism. Anxiety. Tourette. Eating disorders.

12 disorder groups. 52 publications. Every GWAS summary statistic from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium.

Before: wget, gunzip, 20 minutes debugging separators, repeat 50 times.
Now: one line of Python.

Bookmarked from signüll @signulll

“you've got to start with the customer experience and work backwards to the technology. you can't start with the technology and try to figure out where you're going to try to sell it.”

this is the fundamental problem with almost all of ai today. the founders who'll win are the ones who identify specific, painful, recurring workflows & make them vanish.

Saved on Hacker News · submitted by player_piano

I've long been into finding deals on government auction sites (seizures, surplus sales etc.) - right now for example San Diego DHS is selling 26 tons of lead shot, with bidding starting at $1,000 ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

It has historically been extremely tedious though: scanning dozens of janky sites which have interminable page loading times; back buttons take you all the way back to the homepage etc.

The site I built - GovAuctions - lets you search every government surplus auction at once. You can filter by location, category, and price, save items to a watchlist, and get alerts when new auctions match what you're looking for.

Let me know what you think, if you have any suggestions, and if you find any deals in your area!

Bookmarked from Andrej Karpathy @karpathy

Something I've been thinking about - I am bullish on people (empowered by AI) increasing the visibility, legibility and accountability of their governments.

Historically, it is the governments that act to make society legible (e.g. "Seeing like a state" is the common reference), but with AI, society can dramatically improve its ability to do this in reverse. Government accountability has not been constrained by access (the various branches of government publish an enormous amount of data), it has been constrained by intelligence - the ability to process a lot of raw data, combine it with domain expertise and derive insights. As an example, the 4000-page omnibus bill is "transparent" in principle and in a legal sense, but certainly not in a practical sense for most people. There's a lot more like it: laws, spending bills, federal budgets, freedom of information act responses, lobbying disclosures... Only a few highly trained professionals (investigative journalists) could historically process this information. This bottleneck might dissolve - not only are the professionals further empowered, but a lot more people can participate.

Some examples to be precise: Detailed accounting of spending and budgets, diff tracking of legislation, individual voting trends w.r.t. stated positions or speeches, lobbying and influence (e.g. graph of lobbyist -> firm -> client -> legislator -> committee -> vote -> regulation), procurement and contracting, regulatory capture warning lights, judicial and legal patterns, campaign finance... Local governments might be even more interesting because the governed population is smaller so there is less national coverage: city council meetings, decisions around zoning, policing, schools, utilities...

Certainly, the same tools can easily cut the other way and it's worth being very mindful of that, but I lean optimistic overall that added participation, transparency and accountability will improve democratic, free societies.

(the quoted tweet is half-ish related, but inspired me to post some recent thoughts)

Bookmarked from Tobby_scraper @Tobby_scraper

Your app description doesn't sell your app.

Your title does.

Most indie devs write titles like: "FocusFlow - Productivity"
Top grossing apps write: "Focus Timer: Deep Work Sessions"

Keywords in your title rank 3x higher than keywords in your description.

Rename the app. Watch the downloads change!

Bookmarked from César Álvarez @cesaralvarezll

This is how a hard paywall app making $200K/month onboards its users

Onboarding

  • Really short (just 4 slides)
  • Clean, professional feel
  • Smooth, polished animations
  • Quick video demo showing value

Paywall

  • Hard paywall
  • “Special offer” framing
  • Heavy discounted yearly plan
  • Weekly plan with 3 day free trial

You can create great short onboarding if you clearly show the value.

Start building yours with Anything

Bookmarked from Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡ @shanaka86

BREAKING: Zelensky just landed in the UAE and signed a defence cooperation agreement with President MBZ.

The deal on the table changes everything about this war. Ukraine is offering Gulf states 1,000 drone interceptors per day. Each Sting interceptor costs $2,100. Each Patriot missile it replaces costs $3.9 million. In exchange, Ukraine wants the Patriot missiles the Gulf states are burning through, because Kyiv cannot get enough of them to stop Russian missiles.

Read that again. The country America refused to arm fast enough is now arming America’s allies with a weapon that costs 1,857 times less than the one America cannot produce fast enough.

The National reported on March 27 that Zelensky told reporters: “We’d like to quietly receive the Patriot missiles we have a deficit of, and give them a corresponding number of interceptors.” AFP confirmed the UAE agreement on March 28. Eleven countries have formally requested Ukraine’s drone defence expertise per Zelensky’s own count. Over 200 Ukrainian military specialists are already deployed across the UAE, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and Jordan.

Here is the arithmetic that should terrify every Pentagon procurement officer on earth.

The United States fired 943 Patriot interceptors in the first four days of the Iran war per a US Congressional study cited by the Jerusalem Post. That is eighteen months of Lockheed Martin’s annual production consumed in 96 hours. Each of those 943 shots cost $3.9 million. Total expenditure: $3.68 billion in four days on defensive interceptions alone. Iran produces 10,000 Shahed drones per month per Reuters. Each drone costs $20,000 to $50,000. The cost exchange ratio is 114 to 1 in Iran’s favour per Military Times.

Ukraine’s Sting interceptor inverts this arithmetic entirely. At $2,100, the cost ratio flips from 114-to-1 against America to roughly 10-to-1 against Iran. Ukraine can supply 1,000 per day. That is 30,000 per month against Iran’s 10,000 Shaheds per month. For the first time in this war, the defender’s production rate exceeds the attacker’s production rate at a fraction of the cost.

And the country that built this weapon is the same country that Trump publicly rejected. “No, they are not helping. We do not need their help. We know more about drones than anyone else” per Fox News. He doubled down: “The last person we need help from is Zelensky.” Meanwhile the Pentagon notified Congress of plans to redirect $750 million in Ukraine-bound Patriot missiles to Gulf states per House of Saud reporting. America is simultaneously refusing Ukraine’s cheap solution and cannibalising Ukraine’s expensive one.

Zelensky framed this explicitly. He told The National: “No matter how many Patriots, THAADs, or other air-defence systems are in the Middle East, that alone is not enough for fully effective air defence.” He told the UK Parliament: “When it comes to shooting down massive Shahed attacks, only Ukrainian experience can really help with this today.”

The Pentagon is spending $3.9 million per interception, raiding Swiss fighter jet accounts to cover shortfalls, and diverting Ukraine’s own Patriot supply to the Gulf. Zelensky is offering the same result for $2,100 and producing 1,000 units per day. The market has a word for this kind of disruption.

The $2,100 drone is the most important weapon in this war. And the country that built it is the one America said it did not need.

Full analysis -

Bookmarked from Nav Toor @heynavtoor

🚨 One photo of your face. That's all someone needs to become you on a live video call. In real time. Right now. The tool is free and open source.

It's called Deep-Live-Cam.

One image. One click. You become anyone on a live webcam feed. No training. No datasets. No waiting. Instant.

Your face. Your expressions. Your mouth movements. All stolen from a single photo.

Here's what this thing does:

→ Upload one photo of any face
→ Turn on your webcam
→ You are now that person. Live. In real time.
→ It matches your pose, your expressions, even your lighting
→ Mouth masking so the swapped face moves its lips when you talk
→ Multi-face mapping. Swap different faces on different people in the same call.
→ Virtual camera output. Plug it into Zoom, Google Meet, Teams. Nobody knows.
→ Works on NVIDIA, AMD, Intel, and Apple Silicon

Here's the part that should terrify you:

Your boss could be on a Zoom call with someone wearing your face right now. A scammer could call your parents looking exactly like you. A stranger could take your LinkedIn photo and become you in a video meeting.

IShowSpeed's reaction when he saw it: "What the F**! This shit is crazy!"

SomeOrdinaryGamers: "That's fucking freaky dude... that's so wild."

This was the #1 trending repo on GitHub the day it launched. 1,600 stars in 24 hours. 80K+ stars today.

No one is ready for what this means. And it's already out there.

100% Open Source.

Bookmarked from Alex Vech @VechAlex

imagine an app that reads bedtime stories to your kids in your own voice.

you record yourself for 2 minutes. thats it.
the app can read any book to them after that.

37% of parents travel for work regularly.
for the ones who still want to tuck their kids in at night.