Alexis Rondeau

Bookmarks

5633 bookmarks · page 200 of 226

Bookmarked from Frederik Gieschen @FrederikNeckar

Jerry Seinfeld on why he still works hard: "Because the only thing in life that's really worth having is good skill. Good skill is the greatest possession. The things that money buys are fine. They're good, I like them, but having a skill - I learned this from reading Esquire magazine. They did one issue about Mastery. This is a very Zen Buddhist concept: pursue mastery. That will fulfill your life. You will feel good. I know a lot of rich people. They don't feel good - as you think they should and would - they don't. They're miserable. So I work because if, you don't, in standup comedy, if you don't do it a lot, you stink."

Bookmarked from Alex Hormozi @AlexHormozi

Cheat codes at 34 I wish I knew at 24:

Anything worth doing takes a lot longer than you think. And until you work for 1000 hours on one project, you don’t begin to know how much work it takes to make something great. And, as a result, how few things you can really make.

Bookmarked from Dan Kulkov @DanKulkov

Not sure where to start with emails?

1. Build a free tool that collects emails
2. Write a sequence for those who left an email
3. Write a sequence for those who signed up for your product
4. Write a sequence for those who purchased
5. Send a weekly newsletter to all emails

Bookmarked from Jason Fried @jasonfried

At 37signals, three is a magic number.

Nearly all new product work is done by teams of three people. A team of three is usually composed of two programmers and one designer. And if it’s not three, it’s two or one — not four or five. We don’t throw more people at problems, we chisel problems down until they can be tackled by three people, at most.

We rarely have meetings, but when we do, you’ll hardly ever find more than three people on a call. Any conversation with more than three people is typically a conversation with too many people.

What if there are five departments involved in a project or a decision? There aren’t. Too many dependencies. We don’t work on projects like that — intentionally.

What is it with three? Three is a wedge, and that’s why it works. Three has a sharp point. It’s an odd number so there are no ties. It’s powerful enough to make a dent, but also weak enough to not break what isn’t broken. Big teams make things worse all the time by applying too much force to things that only need to be lightly finessed.

The problem with four is that you almost always need to add a fifth to manage. The problem with five is that it’s two too many. And six, seven, or eight on a team will inevitably make simple things more complicated than they need to be.

Just like work expands to fill the time available, work expands to fill the team available. Small, short projects become bigger, longer projects simply because all those people need something to do.

You can do big things with small teams, but it’s a whole hell of a lot harder to do small things with big teams. That’s a disadvantage of big teams! Small things are often all that’s necessary. The occasional big thing is great, but most improvements come as small incremental steps. Big teams can step right over those small moves.

Three keeps you honest. It tempers your ambition in all the right ways. It requires you to make tradeoffs, rather than keep adding things in. And most importantly, three reduces miscommunication and improves coordination. Three people can talk directly with one another without introducing hearsay. And it’s a heck of a lot easier to coordinate three people’s schedules than four or more.

Three is all-in for us.