Alexis Rondeau

Bookmarks

5632 bookmarks · page 58 of 226

Bookmarked from fatih kadir akın @fkadev

🚀 Announcing: MCP Startup Boilerplate v0.0.1!
⭐ github.com/f/mcp-startup-…

Build paid MCP startups with a free and open-source Rails boilerplate using Claude integration!

Complete OAuth2, Stripe payments, and modern Tailwind UI for your users to manage their subscriptions, tool calls and more!

Turn your Rails app into a monetized AI toolbox in minutes, FREE!

Contributions welcome on GitHub!

Bookmarked from signüll @signulll

my friend & i were chatting about how to generate good ideas & realized most ppl don’t really think in systems. this is often the best way to think of & evaluate ideas.

systems thinking requires some small mechanical elements but it’s pretty easy if you practice, & super useful too. it’s how you find leverage for big ideas. one simple strategy is to just flip one bit in a large scale system & see what it could potentially require/unlock.

i wrote a first post on how to think in systems in very basic terms.

Bookmarked from Andrew Gazdecki @agazdecki

Most deals on @acquiredotcom don’t fall apart in due diligence. They die before that on price and valuation. A few weeks ago a founder listed a profitable SaaS with good numbers. Low churn, 10% growth, happy customers. Great business.

But they priced it at 10x profit. When they went live? No buyer messages. No NDAs. Nothing. Silence.

We suggested adjusting the price based on multiples we typically see, dropped it to 5x and suddenly: 100+ buyer messages, 40+ NDAs and 1 LOI in under a week.

The lesson here? This isn’t a year long strategic acquisition process. It’s a marketplace. Buyers are browsing dozens of deals. You need to be competitive.

If your price doesn’t make sense: buyers won't send feedback and they will just move on. If it does make sense, you will likely see offers.

Pricing high may feel great initially but it doesn't get you anywhere. Pricing within market multiples is how you get an actual deal done.

Bookmarked from signüll @signulll

one of the most profound shifts happening right now is that we’ve created an ai, a synthetic entity, that listens better than any human ever could. it’s not just passive hearing, it’s active, thoughtful engagement. it has the ability to push back, to be infinitely patient, to actually process what you’re saying… this is absolutely insane.

we’re used to thinking of tech as a way to amplify human capabilities, but now it’s doing something subtler, giving us the experience of being heard in a way that most humans can’t manage. it’s not just about machines listening. it’s about machines actually getting it.

we’re the only species that’s pulled this off, but the real flex isn’t the tech. it’s that we’ve created something that fills a gap in human interaction itself that never gets tired. that’s a crazy step change.

Bookmarked from Startup Archive @StartupArchive_

Tony Fadell (iPod creator) on the culture clash between Apple and Google

“At Apple, you couldn’t hide. If you were hiding, someone would say, ‘What the [expletive]? Why aren’t you doing the thing we need?’ Everyone was critical.”

When Tony sold his company Nest to Google for $3.2B, and the contrast couldn’t have been sharper.

“At Google, it’s 20% time. You were lucky if they even showed up… They’d take the bus in for lunch, get a massage, grab yogurt, and head home. It was [expletive]. Everyone could hide.”

Fadell says that level of comfort breeds mediocrity that’s dangerous for early-stage startups.

That’s why he warns founders against hiring “career Googlers” with 15–20 years of tenure:

“It will mess up your culture.”

He’s seen this pattern before — way back in the ‘90s at General Magic:

We swore we’d never hire people from the East Coast. They needed a driver, a company car, an executive toilet. We said, ‘It’s a culture clash…And now? “Silicon Valley has become that. Entitlement everywhere.”

Great cultures are built on urgency, ownership, and accountability — not perks. Hire people who ship, not people who hide.

Video source: @TechCrunch (2024)

Bookmarked from Andrej Karpathy @karpathy

A major mistake I made in my undergrad is that I focused way too much on mathematical lens of computing - computability, decidability, asymptotic complexity etc. And too little on physical lens - energy/heat of state change, data locality, parallelism, computer architecture. The former is interesting; The latter bestows power.

Bookmarked from Andrew Gazdecki @agazdecki

I started @acquiredotcom for founders like me: scrappy, efficient, and profit focused. Somewhere along the way, I lost that. Not anymore.

We’re not building for the ones chasing unicorn status or who care about TechCrunch headlines. We’re building for the ones who know a $1–$5M exit can change everything.

The ones who believe a profitable sustainable business is way cooler than burning millions on growth. That’s who this company has always been built for.

But we got off track. We raised venture capital during ZIRP. Hired fast. Added complexity. Slowed down. Too many meetings. It stopped being fun.

So we made a change.
We’re returning millions back to investors.

Grateful for that support but it pushed us in directions that didn’t serve the bootstrapped founders we set out to help. Now we’re off the VC treadmill for good. Lean. Profitable. In control of our own destiny.

Last month we did $250,000+ in profit.

That felt better than any funding round ever could. For the first time in years, we get to build the way we always meant to: Scrappy. Efficient. Profitable. Built for founders.

No board pushing us to 10x. No burn. No fundraising. Just the freedom to build an enduring platform for entrepreneurs around the globe to get acquired.

We’ve already helped over 1,000 founders. Now we’re building for the next 1,000. We’re building @acquiredotcom for the people who bet on themselves.

And we're just getting started!